2Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara-Türkiye
3Department of Radiation Oncology, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana-Türkiye
4Department of Radiation Oncology, İstanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Oncology, İstanbul-Türkiye
5Department of Radiation Oncology, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine İstanbul-Türkiye
6Department of Radiation Oncology, Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun-Türkiye
7Department of Radiation Oncology, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul-Türkiye DOI : 10.5505/tjo.2022.3822 OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to compare Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 and 2018 staging systems in patients with uterine cervical cancer.
METHODS
Medical records of 571 patients who were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy between
2001 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival
(PFS) rates according to FIGO 2009 and FIGO 2018 staging systems were compared using the log-rank test. Cox
regression model was used to identify independent prognostic factors for survival.
RESULTS
The median follow-up was 59 months. Five-year OS and PFS rates were 81.1% and 77.7%, respectively. Stage
migration was recorded in 401 patients (70.2%) and the most remarkable stage migration was detected in stage I
patients (60%). A total of 157 (27.5%) patients upstaged to stage IIIC disease. According to FIGO 2009, 5-year OS
rates were 87.3%, 80.5% (p=0.076), and PFS rates were 82.8%, 77.5% (p=0.036) for stage IB1 and IB2, respectively.
According to FIGO 2018, the 5-year OS rates for stage IB1, IB2, and IB3 were 89.8%, 87.1%, and 81.4% (p=0.310),
and PFS rates were 90.2%, 80.5%, and 80.1% (p=0.189), respectively. Patients with ?2 pelvic lymph node (LN)
metastases had worse 5-year OS and PFS rates than patients with one metastasis (p=0.015 and p=0.006). Number
of para-aortic LN metastasis and metastatic LN ratio (MLNR) were also correlated with 5-year OS and PFS.
CONCLUSION
Current FIGO staging system better discriminates patients with cervical cancer. However, integration of
metastatic LN number and/or MLNR to the upcoming FIGO staging system may improve the prognostic
value of the staging.